HAARP is miscredited as a cause of floods, but it studies the ionosphere rather than manipulating weather. Recent severe flooding is linked to climate change, which intensifies rainfall due to increased moisture in a warming atmosphere, not weather modification.
The High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP), an atmospheric research facility in Alaska, is frequently misattributed as a cause of severe flooding events. However, HAARP focuses on studying the ionosphere, high above the weather-producing layers of the atmosphere, and its radio waves do not interact with ground-level weather systems. The recent increase in flooding incidents is more accurately associated with climate change, which intensifies rainfall through increased atmospheric moisture. Scientific evidence indicates that as global temperatures rise, heavy precipitation events are becoming more severe, thus leading to the worsened flooding observed in places such as Spain, New Mexico, and Dubai.
Climate change has been established as a significant factor in influencing weather patterns and extreme weather events, particularly heavy rainfall and flooding. Recent studies demonstrate that with each degree Celsius increase in temperature, the atmosphere can hold approximately 6-7% more moisture, resulting in more intense precipitation events. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has emphasized that human-induced factors, particularly greenhouse gas emissions, are the primary drivers of observed intensifications in heavy precipitation. As global temperatures rise, the risks and severity of flooding related to heavy rainfall are projected to increase.
In conclusion, HAARP does not possess the capability to manipulate weather patterns, including triggering floods. Its functions are confined to studying the ionosphere, far above the layers that influence precipitation. The phenomenon of increasing rainfall and severe flooding incidents can be more accurately attributed to the tangible impacts of climate change rather than unsubstantiated claims of weather manipulation. Responsible discourse regarding climate and weather must recognize these scientific realities.
Original Source: science.feedback.org
