Russia vetoed a UN resolution calling for a ceasefire in Sudan, causing outrage from the British Foreign Secretary. The resolution aimed to end hostilities between Sudan’s military and paramilitary forces amidst a humanitarian crisis. The global political landscape continues to influence the UN’s capability to address such conflicts effectively.
On November 18, 2024, Russia exercised its veto power against a UN Security Council resolution aimed at halting the ongoing hostilities in Sudan. The resolution, co-authored by Britain and Sierra Leone, demanded an immediate ceasefire and the initiation of dialogue towards a national ceasefire amidst devastating clashes between Sudan’s military and paramilitary forces. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy condemned Russia’s obstruction, labeling it a significant hindrance to the council’s unified stance on crisis intervention.
Since April 2023, Sudan has been embroiled in conflict between rival factions led by General Abdel Fattah Al Burhan and General Mohamed Hamdan Daglo. The fighting has led to a catastrophic humanitarian situation, with millions displaced and hundreds of thousands of casualties reported. The UN Security Council has faced challenges in addressing international conflicts, often paralyzed due to disagreements among its permanent members, particularly Russia and the United States, which complicates consensus-building during crises.
The Russian veto reflects ongoing geopolitical tensions and highlights the complexities involved in addressing the humanitarian crisis in Sudan. Despite the dire situation and international calls for intervention, the Security Council’s effectiveness remains compromised by divisions among its members. The future of peace and stability in Sudan hinges on both international cooperation and the willingness of the involved parties to engage in constructive dialogue.
Original Source: www.jordantimes.com
