The Sudanese army will persist with military operations against the RSF, despite ongoing international ceasefire efforts, according to Gen Ibrahim Gabir. The civil war has led to a catastrophic humanitarian situation. Diplomatic efforts have stalled, while accusations of arms dealings and war crimes complicate the conflict further. The future stability of Sudan remains uncertain as both parties continue their fighting.
A high-ranking Sudanese general recently asserted that the army will continue its military offensive despite ongoing international efforts to negotiate a ceasefire in the prolonged civil war. Assistant Commander-in-Chief Lt Gen Ibrahim Gabir stated, “Peace talks can go on, but the army will not stop for that,” while also indicating that an operation has been initiated to reclaim control of Khartoum from the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF).
The conflict began in April of last year following a dispute between the leaders over the nation’s future, resulting in a severe humanitarian crisis impacting millions. Gen Gabir emphasized the army’s demands for the RSF to withdraw from occupied territories and called for international pressure on the militia. He expressed confidence in the army’s position, insisting that negotiations would only lead to a cessation of hostilities once the RSF complies with these demands.
Despite attempts at diplomacy, efforts to bring about a cessation of hostilities have not progressed, according to U.S. Sudan Envoy Tom Perriello, who described the situation as extremely dire. He acknowledged some improvement in humanitarian access, with aid trucks entering areas previously blocked, but stressed that this was insufficient in scale. The army’s blockade of aid shipments has been a significant issue, as has the RSF’s role in exacerbating hunger.
Gen Gabir denied claims that the army had stalled on humanitarian-related paperwork and diverted blame to the RSF for looting aid supplies. He reiterated the RSF’s responsibility for the hunger crisis while contradicting assertions of famine conditions in certain areas made by UN experts. The Sudanese government has not formally declared famine, which is necessary to enable UN humanitarian actions across borders.
The focus of the army’s operations remains on the Darfur region, asserting that the border with Chad has been a route for mercenaries and arms supplied by foreign nations. Gen Gabir accused the RSF of receiving technological support from the United Arab Emirates, whose involvement is denied by the UAE but is supported by UN reports. He disclosed potential discussions on arms purchases from Iran, stating, “You can find weapons if you have money and facilitation of payment.”
In response to allegations of war crimes, General Gabir acknowledged that instances of misconduct may occur but distinguished between the actions of individuals and the army as an institution. Refusing to predict the conflict’s duration, he referenced past Sudanese civil wars that have spanned many years, explaining that the vastness of Sudan and the size of the opposing forces contribute to this complexity. Ultimately, he affirmed the army’s intent to achieve victory and reconstruct the nation.
The civil war in Sudan, which erupted in April of the previous year, stems from escalating tensions between military factions over governance and control. The conflict has caused immense humanitarian distress, with millions displaced and food insecurity affecting large portions of the population. Efforts by international entities to mediate a ceasefire have faced significant challenges, as the warring factions have maintained their positions, undermining diplomatic negotiations. The Rapid Support Forces, a paramilitary group, have been accused of feeding the humanitarian crisis through blockades and looting humanitarian supplies, raising serious concerns about the delivery of aid. Both national and international actors are seeking ways to address these issues while contending with the complexities of support from foreign nations and the internal dynamics of the warring factions. Arms supplies from countries like the United Arab Emirates and discussions around weapons transactions with Iran add further layers to the conflict. Allegations of war crimes complicate the scenario, as both sides have faced scrutiny for their conduct amid escalating violence and human rights violations.
In summary, the Sudanese army, led by Gen Ibrahim Gabir, remains resolute in its military endeavors despite international calls for a ceasefire amidst a dire humanitarian crisis. Ongoing negotiations have yet to yield tangible results, and concerns regarding foreign support for the RSF complicate the conflict dynamics. The humanitarian situation remains critical, exacerbated by the actions of both warring factions, necessitating urgent international attention to mitigate the suffering of the Sudanese population. Ultimately, the stability of Sudan hinges on a fundamental reassessment of power dynamics and a commitment to resolving disputes peacefully.
Original Source: www.bbc.com
