Iraq maintains a cautious stance regarding the recent political changes in Syria, particularly the appointment of Ahmad Al-Sharaa as transitional president. The Iraqi government focuses on supporting Syria’s territorial integrity and an inclusive political process while limiting direct engagement. Analysts highlight the uncertainty surrounding Syria’s foreign policy and internal dynamics, which impact Iraq’s approach to future relations.
Iraq has chosen to remain largely silent regarding recent political developments in Syria, notably the appointment of Ahmad Al-Sharaa as the transitional president. Analysts suggest Baghdad will continue this cautious approach while observing regional dynamics and Syria’s official responses before solidifying its stance. Since the fall of Bashar Al-Assad’s regime, Iraq has refrained from engaging directly with the new Syrian government under Al-Sharaa, affirming its support for Syria’s territorial integrity and an inclusive political process without interfering in internal matters. Iraq’s delegation has been limited to sending its intelligence chief, Hamid Al-Shatri, to meet Syrian officials.
The new Syrian administration has enacted significant changes, dissolving the previous regime’s military and security structures, abolishing the constitution, and dismantling the longstanding Baath Party. While Al-Sharaa did not specifically address Syria’s foreign relations in his recent statements, Foreign Minister Asaad Al-Shibani asserted the intent to pursue a foreign policy that emphasizes tension reduction and peace in the region, aiming for Syria to take a leading role in those efforts.
The Syrian transitional government has expressed a desire to cultivate peaceful relations with neighboring countries, including Iraq. Syrian writer and researcher Bassem Suleiman echoed this sentiment, commenting that the new government seeks balanced relations with all parties to concentrate on rebuilding Syria. Suleiman highlighted the government’s intentions to resolve previous conflicts and foster a collaborative environment with Iraq.
Ahmad Al-Sharaa, previously known as Abu Muhammad Al-Jolani, has a controversial past linked to Al-Qaeda in Iraq before transitioning to Syria. Following a notable military campaign leading to the overthrow of Assad’s regime, he has re-established his identity and is now regarded as a critical ally of Iraq’s government. During the recent regime changes, Iraq tightened its security along the border with Syria, enhancing surveillance and deploying numerous soldiers to prevent instability.
Despite the hopes for future cooperation, Iraq’s political stance remains cautious. Mukhtar Al-Musawi, a member of Iraq’s Foreign Relations Committee, expressed concerns regarding the clarity of Syria’s new position and noted the complexities posed by the Syrian Democratic Forces controlling significant territory. Dr. Ihsan Al-Shammari identified various critical factors influencing Iraq’s response, including previous hostile remarks against Al-Sharaa, lack of an electoral process for his rise to power, and ongoing security concerns regarding ISIS.
Ultimately, Iraq’s engagement with Syria hinges on evolving circumstances and official declarations from the Syrian government. While Iraq has expressed a welcome to Al-Sharaa’s appointment, it seeks the completion of transitional requirements and the inclusion of diverse political factions in Syria’s future governance. Continued apprehension about Syria’s political trajectory suggests Iraq will maintain a prudent stance, waiting for further international developments before making more significant commitments in the relationship with Syria.
The political landscape in Syria has transformed dramatically since the fall of Bashar Al-Assad’s regime. The new leadership under Ahmad Al-Sharaa has sparked concern and anticipation in neighboring Iraq, which has traditionally been cautious about involvement in Syrian affairs. Iraq’s historical ties, security anxieties, and evolving regional dynamics necessitate a watchful approach as Iraq evaluates the implications of Syria’s new transitional government and its policies moving forward.
In conclusion, Iraq’s restrained response to Syria’s evolving political situation reflects deep-seated concerns about stability, security coordination, and the complex relationship between various factions within Syria. While there are indications of a desire for improved relations, Iraq is likely to remain cautious until clearer policies from Syria’s new leadership emerge. The intricate dynamics between Iraq and Syria will require careful navigation to mitigate potential conflicts and enhance regional security.
Original Source: shafaq.com
