The Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) assert they will retain arms until ISIS is defeated, as political tensions rise under new President Ahmed Al Shara. The SDF seeks decentralization and fears marginalization could ignite civil unrest. Dialogue continues regarding military integration and local governance amid ongoing U.S. support against ISIS and the need for peace with Turkey.
The Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), predominantly Kurdish and backed by the United States, assert that they will maintain their armaments until ISIS is effectively defeated on Syrian soil. Ilham Ahmed, a senior Kurdish political figure, emphasized the necessity of continuing their defenses amidst reports of an ISIS resurgence. She expressed concerns that this stance may lead to further divisions within Syria as the new President Ahmed Al Shara seeks to centralize control and disarm paramilitary groups.
Ahmed stated that the marginalization of Syria’s Kurdish population, which constitutes approximately 10% of the nation, raises the potential for civil unrest. “Should the local identities of various groups continue to be denied, this will pave the way towards an internal conflict,” she warned. The SDF seeks to establish a decentralized governance structure in the north-east of Syria, an area critical for its oil and gas reserves.
Despite discussions held between the SDF representatives and President Al Shara, the new ruling authorities have denied the SDF’s request for autonomy within the broader Syrian armed forces. Ahmed highlighted the importance of ongoing dialogues while noting this meeting possibility might dictate Syria’s political future. Furthermore, she mentioned that other paramilitary groups remain armed, underscoring the disparity and complications in the disarmament negotiations.
U.S. officials reiterated their commitment to the SDF’s ongoing collaboration against ISIS, even amidst uncertainties regarding U.S. military support. While the prospect of U.S. withdrawal looms, the SDF affirms its readiness to cooperate with the Syrian army conditionally based on an end to Turkish military operations. Ahmed indicated that mutual discussions would persist and acknowledged the need for integrating services for the local populace.
Postulating on the potential for the SDF to eventually merge with the Syrian army, Ahmed identified the necessity of peace with Turkey as a precondition for such cooperation. In light of Al Shara’s acknowledgment of the SDF’s willingness to place their weapons under state control, a continual dialogue remains critical to address pressing matters including military agreements and local governance support.
In summary, the continued armament of the Syrian Democratic Forces underscores the persistent conflict with ISIS and the complexities surrounding the integration of paramilitary groups within Syria. Ilham Ahmed’s statements reflect a precarious balance between maintaining security against ISIS and the need for political recognition within a fragmented governance structure. Emphasizing dialogue and cooperation, the SDF navigates its relationship with both the U.S. and Syrian authorities while advocating for local autonomy and recognition of Kurdish identity.
Original Source: www.thenationalnews.com
