The paramilitary RSF’s attempt to form a “parallel government” in Sudan through a charter signed in Kenya has sparked serious concerns over the country’s stability. This move, coupled with ongoing conflict with the SAF, has resulted in thousands dead and millions displaced, prompting international responses, especially from the UN and Saudi Arabia. The situation continues to escalate, signaling deeper divisions within Sudan.
On February 22, the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and allied groups declared plans to establish a “parallel government” in Sudan through a political charter signed in Kenya. This action has raised significant concerns domestically and internationally regarding further divisions in Sudan, which has been plagued by conflict between the RSF and the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) for nearly two years. The ongoing violence has resulted in over 29,600 fatalities and the displacement of more than 15 million individuals, as reported by crisis monitoring groups.
As the conflict approaches its second anniversary, analysts suggest that persistent failure in achieving political settlements has led to the RSF’s recent actions. Political expert Abdul-Raziq Ziyada notes that this situation reflects an escalation in conflict and a shift in power dynamics. Furthermore, Khalid Dirar from the al-Rasid Center emphasizes that the RSF’s attempts to formalize a separate governance structure could significantly affect the nation’s balance of power.
Military expert Ahmed Ismail indicates that the RSF’s push for a parallel government could result in critical changes, particularly as it seeks to establish a presence in areas beyond Darfur. Similarly, Abdul-Rahman Awad underscores the severe implications of having two competing governments, predicting dire political, security, and economic consequences for Sudan.
Significantly, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed grave concern over these developments, warning that they could deepen the fragmentation within Sudan and exacerbate the already dire crisis. He emphasized the necessity of maintaining Sudan’s unity and territorial integrity for sustainable conflict resolution.
Additionally, Saudi Arabia, a key mediator in the negotiations, publicly rejected the formation of a parallel government, asserting that any such actions would undermine Sudan’s official institutions and threaten its unity. On the diplomatic front, tensions between Sudan and Kenya intensified following the charter’s signing, with Sudan’s Foreign Ministry signaling repercussions for Kenya’s involvement with the RSF.
The recent initiative by Sudan’s RSF to establish a parallel government raises critical concerns about the country’s stability amid ongoing violence. Analysts fear increased division and power struggles could hinder peaceful resolutions, drawing attention from international powers like the UN and Saudi Arabia, who reject such unilateral actions. Without a unified effort to resolve the conflict, Sudan risks further fragmentation and a deepening crisis.
Original Source: english.news.cn
