African Hub, a popular influencer, misquoted DRC President Tshisekedi regarding military intervention for mineral control. Tshisekedi sought international investment and pressure on Rwanda, not military support. His spokesperson clarified the desirability for international buyers to purchase DRC minerals directly in light of ongoing conflict with M23 rebels supported by Rwanda. The EU and UK have responded with sanctions against Rwanda while reassessing financial relationships.
On social media, a popular influencer known as African Hub misattributed statements to Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi, alleging that he requested U.S. military intervention in exchange for control over the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s (DRC) mineral resources. This claim stems from a Feb. 20 interview with The New York Times, but it misrepresents Tshisekedi’s actual comments, which did not include any military offers.
In the interview, President Tshisekedi emphasized the need for international support to bring stability to his nation, particularly through investments from Western countries and pressure against Rwanda. His spokesperson, Tina Salama, clarified on Feb. 23 that Tshisekedi’s invitation was directed to the U.S. and European nations to purchase minerals directly from the DRC, debunking the military intervention claim.
Salama asserted, “Setting the record straight: President Tshisekedi invites the USA… to purchase them directly from us, the rightful owners,” highlighting that this offer extended beyond American companies to include European suppliers as well. The DRC, rich in essential minerals like coltan and cobalt, is currently affected by conflict with M23 rebels, who are allegedly backed by Rwanda.
As part of the ongoing conflict, Tshisekedi accused Rwanda of plundering the DRC’s resources while smuggling them through infrastructure controlled by these rebels. In February 2024, it was reported that the European Union had negotiated a substantial deal with Rwanda for access to various minerals. However, following Tshisekedi’s accusations, the EU has suspended this agreement and is considering sanctions against the Rwandan government.
Additionally, the United Kingdom has imposed sanctions on Rwanda while halting bilateral financial support. The U.S. Treasury has also sanctioned James Kabarebe, highlighting international response to the situation, as pressure mounts against Rwanda’s actions. Overall, President Tshisekedi’s call for international engagement addresses the illegal exploitation of Congolese resources rather than military intervention or control over these minerals.
In conclusion, President Tshisekedi’s statements were misquoted, as he did not solicit U.S. military involvement or cede control over DRC resources. His spokesperson emphasized that the appeal for mineral purchases was directed at numerous international entities to combat the illegal trade involving Rwanda and the M23 rebels. International reactions, including sanctions against Rwanda, illustrate the escalating situation regarding resource exploitation in the DRC.
Original Source: www.voanews.com
