The article reviews Chitra Subramaniam’s book ‘Boforsgate,’ which exposes the deep-seated corruption in Indian politics stemming from the 1987 Bofors arms deal. The narrative emphasizes the challenges faced by journalists in uncovering truth and the systemic reverberations of corruption within Indian governance. It underscores the need for accountability and transparency in politics, suggesting a bipartisan complicity in corruption that still endures today.
In her insightful book ‘Boforsgate,’ investigative journalist Chitra Subramaniam uncovers the dark underbelly of Indian politics, revealing the intricate web of corruption that followed the Bofors arms deal. This narrative is not solely about one journalist’s struggle; it showcases a perilous environment where corrupt officials and politicians flourish. Chitra’s persistence in exposing the truth emphasized the severe implications of political graft and the risks undertaken by those who challenge it.
The Bofors scandal, which emerged in 1987, marked a significant moment in Indian politics. With allegations that the Swedish firm bribed Indian officials, the case revealed a toxic blend of power and greed. As an observer during that time, I recall the widespread speculation surrounding Ottavio Quattrocchi and his connections with the Gandhi family, particularly after bribes were traced back to him. His subsequent disappearance underscored the lengths to which individuals would go to evade accountability.
Corruption continues to plague India’s political landscape. Many politicians are perceived to enter public service not for the common good, but as a pathway to personal wealth. This culture of corruption, ignited by scandals like Bofors, now sees political legacies handed down, resulting in the rapid accumulation of wealth among political heirs.
The ramifications of the Bofors case have lingered, affecting electoral outcomes and public sentiment. Rajiv Gandhi’s denial of wrongdoing did little to quell public outrage; instead, it contributed to his electoral defeat in 1989. Conversations about the scandal permeated even the most rural areas, showcasing a nationwide discontent with corruption.
Despite changes in leadership, the pursuit of justice in the Bofors case remains stagnant. Notably, previous Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee expressed intent to investigate but ultimately lost interest. Today, under Narendra Modi’s administration, the investigation appears equally neglected, raising suspicions about a possible bipartisan consensus on corruption among politicians.
The media’s role is crucial, yet journalists face intense pressure for shedding light on scandals of any scale. Chitra Subramaniam’s investigative bravery in Switzerland highlights the dangers faced by reporters in India, where exposing corruption can lead to harassment and violence. Throughout my own career, I have witnessed similar challenges and understand how criticism, especially under Modi’s leadership, can lead to a compliant press landscape.
In conclusion, ‘Boforsgate’ is not merely a retrospective look at a political scandal; it encourages ongoing discourse about accountability in governance. As such, it should prompt leaders, including Prime Minister Modi, to take decisive action regarding the unresolved corruption that remains buried in bureaucratic boxes.
The Boforsgate scandal serves as a critical turning point in India’s political narrative, illustrating the pervasive nature of corruption within government. Chitra Subramaniam’s tireless investigation highlights immense risks undertaken by journalists in the pursuit of truth. This historical context prompts a reevaluation of contemporary political practices, urging the current administration to confront unresolved issues of corruption that persist today.
Original Source: www.financialexpress.com
