The article critiques the report titled “UNCOVERED: Power & Polo” from The Post and Courier for its biased portrayal of the Dasuki family, emphasizing the need for factual, objective journalism. It highlights the historical context of the family’s persecution and the inaccuracies regarding Sambo Dasuki’s business transactions and his tenure as National Security Adviser. The article calls for a reassessment of the treatment of their legacy and the need for respectful representation.
The recent investigative report titled “UNCOVERED: Power & Polo” by The Post and Courier represents a flawed narrative that discredits journalistic integrity and attempts to reinterpret history. It is essential that we shift our focus from media trials to substantive facts and preserve the dignity of the Dasuki family amid their long-standing struggles, which merit a dignified representation.
The Dasuki family has faced a series of persecutions, dating back to the removal of Sultan Alhaji Ibrahim Dasuki, through to the harassment faced by his descendants under General Sani Abacha and former President Muhammadu Buhari. In light of this, the resurfacing of media trials initiates concerns about their motivations and objectivity, particularly regarding investigations funded by grants.
The report insinuates that Sambo Dasuki’s acquisition of Green Hill Farms in 2002 involved dubious financial maneuvers, raising questions that lack formal inquiries or due process. Despite the claims made about his financial transactions, the context and timeline do not substantiate these allegations, leading to an impression of inflammatory journalism rather than factual reporting.
It is perplexing how a legitimate transaction conducted two decades ago is suddenly under scrutiny. The report ignores related historical details and misaligns events to perpetuate a narrative linking Dasuki’s past investments to his alleged corruption charges, fostering sensationalism rather than genuine inquiry.
Moreover, the report’s characterization of Sultan Ibrahim Dasuki reflects a bias that diminishes his substantial contributions to Nigeria as a respected industrialist and political figure. By failing to acknowledge his achievements and philanthropic efforts, the report risks tarnishing his legacy and that of his family unjustly.
The narrative further distorts the reality surrounding Dasuki’s tenure as National Security Adviser, ignoring critical victories against Boko Haram under his leadership. Investigations and records affirm the considerable military successes achieved during his term, countering the narrative presented in the report.
Ultimately, it is crucial to advocate for a rigorous examination of past administrations’ dealings and the alleged corruption that has marred Nigeria’s political landscape. With the ongoing Dasukigate case, an unbiased and fact-based approach to coverage is paramount for the pursuit of justice and transparency in the country.
In summary, the report “UNCOVERED: Power & Polo” fails to uphold journalistic standards by distorting facts and perpetuating historical inaccuracies regarding the Dasuki family. It is imperative to focus on evidence-driven narratives that honor their legacy and contribute to constructive discourse around Nigeria’s political and military history. Moving forward, a commitment to integrity in reporting can aid in the pursuit of fairness and justice.
Original Source: www.premiumtimesng.com
