Sudan has filed a lawsuit against the UAE at the International Court of Justice, accusing it of arming the Rapid Support Forces and violating the Genocide Convention. The UAE aims to dismiss the case, arguing it lacks legal validity. This situation arises amidst severe ethnic violence in West Darfur, where the RSF has attacked the Masalit community.
Sudan has initiated legal proceedings against the United Arab Emirates at the International Court of Justice, alleging that the UAE has violated its obligations under the Genocide Convention by supplying arms to the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF). These allegations are specifically related to the assaults that occurred in West Darfur state. The UAE intends to seek an immediate dismissal of the case, claiming it lacks any substantive legal or factual foundation.
Sudanese officials have consistently accused the UAE of backing the RSF, their adversaries in the ongoing civil conflict. While the UAE has denied these claims, findings from U.N. experts and U.S. lawmakers have deemed them credible. This legal action is framed in the context of severe ethnic violence in West Darfur, where the RSF and allied militias have significantly targeted the Masalit ethnic group.
The World Court highlighted Sudan’s assertion that these violent actions were facilitated by direct support from the UAE to the RSF and affiliated militia groups. An official from the UAE responded by characterizing Sudan’s legal claim as merely a publicity stunt, designed to distract from the Sudanese Armed Forces’ own involvement in ongoing atrocities affecting the nation.
In summary, Sudan has brought forth a case against the UAE at the World Court, alleging support for paramilitary forces involved in recent violent incidents in Darfur. The UAE has announced its intent to dismiss the case, labeling it baseless. This dispute underlines the broader humanitarian crisis in Sudan and the complex international implications involved in the ongoing conflict.
Original Source: www.usnews.com
