Sudan has filed a case against the UAE at the International Court of Justice, alleging that the UAE is violating the Genocide Convention by arming and funding the Rapid Support Forces in Sudan’s conflict, which has resulted in over 24,000 deaths and the displacement of millions. The case also seeks provisional measures to prevent further violence against the Masalit people.
Sudan has initiated legal proceedings against the United Arab Emirates (UAE) at the International Court of Justice, asserting that the UAE has breached the Genocide Convention by supporting the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a rebel paramilitary organization involved in the ongoing conflict in Sudan. The court revealed that this case was submitted on Wednesday and focuses on atrocities allegedly committed by the RSF, including genocide, murder, and human rights violations directed at the Masalit people.
In its official statement, Sudan claims that the UAE has been complicit in these genocidal actions through extensive military, political, and financial support to the RSF militia. The United Arab Emirates has yet to release a public response regarding these serious allegations. Sudan’s legal pursuit also seeks urgent provisional measures from the court to prevent further violence and crimes against the Masalit population.
Since April 2023, Sudan has been engulfed in a devastating conflict, stemming from escalating tensions between its military forces and paramilitary groups, leading to significant casualties and displacement. The United Nations reports over 24,000 fatalities and about 30% of the country’s population, exceeding 14 million individuals, has been displaced due to the violence.
Recent reports highlight that the RSF has established a charter for a parallel government amidst military gains against rival factions. The U.S. Conflict Observatory has tracked UAE arms shipments to the RSF, raising concerns over their implications for the conflict. Additionally, the U.S. Department of the Treasury has enforced sanctions against RSF leadership and affiliated companies in the UAE amid accusations of genocide.
Historically, the region of Darfur in Sudan has been associated with genocide and severe human rights violations, particularly against specific ethnic groups. Rulings from the International Court of Justice are binding; however, they often take several years to be finalized.
In summary, Sudan’s case against the UAE at the International Court of Justice marks a significant legal step in addressing allegations of genocide and human rights violations linked to rebel support. The conflict in Sudan has led to countless casualties and displacements, prompting urgent calls for international intervention and accountability. The outcome of this case could have widespread implications for regional stability and human rights enforcement.
Original Source: www.independent.co.uk
