The Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (R-ARCISS) is ineffective due to persistent failure in implementation by political leaders. Key events illustrate systematic targeting of opposition leaders, violence against SPLM-IO officials, and disregard for constitutional rights. The situation highlights a critical need for leaders to promote collaboration and peace to address ongoing suffering in the country.
The Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (R-ARCISS) has not only been ineffective but appears to be an unfulfilled promise from its inception. The signatory leaders have consistently failed to implement peace agreements, leaving citizens disillusioned. My observations suggest that this peace accord should be deemed an exercise in futility due to a persistent lack of political will, resulting in societal discontent and a disregard toward both citizens and the global community.
My skepticism regarding R-ARCISS is informed by South Sudan’s tumultuous political history characterized by a failure to foster accountability and genuine collaboration amongst leaders. My assessment revolves around three central themes: the agreement is defunct, dysfunctional, and ultimately ineffective. Regrettably, evidence substantiates this viewpoint, with ongoing leader inaction undermining any attempts at peaceful resolution.
The suffering endured by the South Sudanese populace is deeply regrettable, as violence and human rights abuses persist. Six years post-signing, South Sudan grapples with basic stability and governmental functions. R-ARCISS was intended for immediate implementation, yet failure to actualize its provisions has rendered it more symbolic than substantive.
Recent occurrences across three states strongly illustrate the systematic targeting of political adversaries, such as the arrests of SPLM-IO leaders and civil servants. The SPLM-IG has engaged in actions that indicate a calculated strategy against SPLM-IO officials, culminating in unlawful detentions amid attempts to undermine their influence.
On January 15, 2025, an armed operation led by the SPLM-IG in Nasir and Ulang counties exemplified an unwarranted military provocation undermining fragile peace efforts. General Olony Dak Thubo oversaw this maneuver without public scrutiny, demonstrating a troubling agenda behind the operation against the local populace.
Additionally, on February 10, 2025, the abrupt dismissal of Governor Alfred Futuyo from Western Bahr El Ghazal by President Salva Kiir, without SPLM-IO input, signaled blatant disregard for agreement protocols and resulted in escalating violence surrounding the governor’s removal. This mirrors a historical pattern of political purges and unrest.
Furthermore, the arbitrary detention of SPLM-IO officials, such as Minister Puot Kang Chuol, contravenes the Interim Constitution, illustrating the continued neglect for legal processes. The failure to bring individuals to court reflects a broader pattern of impunity that erodes trust in the governance framework.
On March 5, 2025, inquiries regarding the siege of Riek Machar’s residence were met with avoidance from Information Minister Michael Makuei. This silence underscores the precarious state of political relations and inadvertently signals a readiness for unrest that could arise from acknowledging such tensions publicly.
It is crucial for President Salva Kiir to exercise caution and refrain from actions that target pivotal peace figures like Riek Machar, as any aggression would exacerbate conflict and potentially destabilize peace negotiations. Past compromises have proven SPLM-IO’s willingness to partner, fostering a need for reciprocal goodwill from the SPLM-IG for national reconciliation.
In conclusion, the ongoing violation of the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (R-ARCISS) highlights a significant gap between the formal acknowledgment of peace and the lived reality of the South Sudanese people. The failure of political leaders to implement the agreement effectively has entrenched suffering and instability. Moving forward, it is paramount for leaders to prioritize dialogue and cooperation to foster an environment conducive to peace and stability, recognizing the dire needs of their citizens.
Original Source: www.radiotamazuj.org
