The United States has withdrawn from the Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage, disappointing developing nations reliant on this support. The African Group of Negotiators expressed concern over the impact of this exit on vulnerable countries. Climate activist Harjeet Singh highlighted the significance of accountability regarding the US’s historical emissions.
The United States has officially withdrawn from a global agreement meant to compensate developing countries for the impacts of climate change. This decision has drawn profound disappointment from the African Group of Negotiators, who argue that the US, being the country with the greatest historical responsibility for climate issues, is jeopardizing essential support for vulnerable nations facing significant climate-related challenges.
In a formal letter to Jean Christophe Donnellier, the US Department of the Treasury communicated that it is exiting the Board for the Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage, effective immediately. Rebecca Lawlor, Deputy Director of the US Office of Climate and Environment, highlighted that both US representatives on the Board will no longer continue in their roles without replacements.
The establishment of this fund came after years of advocacy from developing nations at the UN climate conference held in Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, in 2022. It was agreed that the fund would be operational from January 1, 2025, after decisive discussions at COP29 in Baku in 2024.
Climate activist Harjeet Singh criticized the decision, asserting that the US’s withdrawal showcases a persistent trend of hindrance by the American government concerning necessary environmental finance. He emphasized the country’s substantial role as a historical emitter and called for accountability, stressing the importance of ensuring that the US contributes appropriately to global climate reparations.
The withdrawal of the United States from the Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage marks a setback for global climate justice efforts, particularly for vulnerable nations relying on support for the repercussions of climate change. This move has elicited disappointment from the African Group of Negotiators and climate advocates, raising questions about accountability and the role of developed nations in addressing climate impacts.
Original Source: www.newsdrum.in
