The article discusses the Israeli regime’s intentions to establish settlements in southern Lebanon and the corresponding concerns regarding the capability of the Lebanese army to deter such encroachments. It highlights the historical context of resistance against occupation, emphasizing the right to armed resistance under international law. The article also critiques the current military and political dynamics within Lebanon, advocating for a comprehensive approach to address these challenges.
Recent events and narratives suggest that the Israeli regime aims to expand its influence into southern Lebanon, a region they distortively identify with northern Galilee, under the guise of establishing settlements as part of a so-called ‘Greater Israel’. This initiative has gained traction among members of the Knesset and investment firms proclaiming settlement projects in the area.
The proposed expansion poses grave risks, mirroring the historical precedent of settlement in the West Bank, which was deemed infeasible half a century ago but subsequently materialized despite international condemnation and various peace accords. This trend raises concerns about the eventual realization of settlement movements in southern Lebanon as well.
The deterrent capacity of the Lebanese army is of paramount importance; any negligence on its part may facilitate further Israeli invasions. Evidence of this can be seen in the ongoing conflict in Syria. Reports indicate that the army has received directives from the United States to refrain from stockpiling arms held by resistance groups south of the Litani River, further complicating the security landscape in Lebanon.
Conflicting reports persist regarding the handling of weapons left behind by resistance fighters, suggesting either seizure or destruction as desired by the Israeli opposition, thereby underscoring that the arms in question should not re-enter Hezbollah’s possession. In a stark contrast to previous calls for vigilance and resistance symbolized by artists like Abdel Halim Hafez, contemporary tapestries seem to echo foolishness with claims like “Keep the weapon exclusive”.
These assertions, predominantly propagated by the anti-Hezbollah factions, indicate a dangerous inclination to suppress historical and inherent rights to resistance against oppression and colonialism. Throughout history, armed resistance has been a universal response to occupation, as evidenced in various movements across the globe.
International laws, including United Nations General Assembly Resolution No. 45/130 and Article 51 of the UN Charter, explicitly recognize the right to armed resistance against foreign aggression, emphasizing the legitimacy of the associated cause. The essence of such resistance is rooted in the pursuit of liberation and dignity, aspects that have been upheld by the Lebanese resistance throughout its historical struggle against occupation.
While the Lebanese army possesses some commendable attributes, its track record with the Israeli forces lacks a deterrent effect. Previous instances have shown divisions within the army, adding complexity to Lebanon’s historical struggle against Israeli occupation. Lately, grassroots movements revealing popular resistance among southern residents have emerged, effectively contributing to the pressure exerted on Israeli forces.
Thus, one must reconsider whether the Lebanese army can adequately safeguard southern Lebanon from prospective Israeli settlements. The ongoing failure to conduct decisive military actions against clear violations questions the army’s capability, leading to renewed calls for the disarmament of resistance motions, which emphasize the need for a robust and comprehensive security strategy in the region.
The situation in southern Lebanon presents an increasingly complex challenge wherein Israeli ambitions threaten to establish settlements under the guise of historical narratives. The effectiveness of the Lebanese army in deterring such threats is under scrutiny due to its recent inaction, while grassroot resistance movements have demonstrated the populace’s enduring resilience. It is crucial to recognize the legitimacy of resistance as an inherent right in the face of colonial aggression, as established by international law. A cohesive strategy, blending military, diplomatic, and popular resistance, is essential in safeguarding Lebanon’s sovereignty.
Original Source: www.tehrantimes.com
