King Abdullah of Jordan advocates for Syria’s stability at a regional meeting, amid discussions regarding postwar Gaza governance. The Arab League’s proposal contrasts with US and Israeli plans, aiming for reconstruction without displacing residents. As political dynamics evolve in Lebanon and Syria, opportunities for cooperation and stability emerge under new leadership and transformative initiatives, including Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030.
King Abdullah of Jordan expressed strong support for Syria’s stability during a recent regional meeting in Amman. The backdrop to this discussion is the ongoing geopolitical turmoil in the region, notably concerning the Arab League’s proposals for managing postwar Gaza. The Arab League’s plan, endorsed by several European leaders, suggests an interim governance of Gaza by a committee of independent experts while international peacekeepers supervise humanitarian efforts.
In the context of contrasting proposals, Saudi columnist Abdulrahman Al-Rashed detailed the competing strategies, noting three critical plans: the Arab League plan advocating for reconstruction without displacing Gaza’s residents, the Israeli plan suggesting occupation, and the controversial Trump administration proposal for Gaza’s redevelopment as a resort, potentially displacing its population.
Al-Rashed emphasized the necessity of the Arab League’s approach in maintaining diplomatic engagement, despite skepticism surrounding the efficacy of the Cairo summit in swaying the White House. He criticized the lack of realistic solutions from conflicting proposals, underscoring the importance of retaining the Palestinian Authority’s role in Gaza governance to ensure legitimacy and international recognition.
As discussions unfold regarding Hamas’s potential participation in the governance of Gaza, concerns remain about its current status as a designated terrorist organization by various countries. Al-Rashed observed that Hamas has shown willingness to support the Cairo plan and step back from direct control, though disarmament remains an unresolved issue.
In light of recent developments, including direct talks between the Trump administration and Hamas, Al-Rashed encouraged a focus on humanitarian outcomes over political posturing. He pointed out the critical influence of Egypt and Qatar on Hamas, believing their involvement could expedite resolutions concerning hostages and governance.
Turning to Lebanon, Al-Rashed expressed optimism following leadership changes that might herald stability after prolonged financial crises and political voids. He mentioned newly elected officials and their potential to foster improved relations with Saudi Arabia, although challenges posed by Hezbollah persist.
Regarding Syria, Al-Rashed welcomed the transitional government led by Ahmed Al-Sharaa, interpreting the ousting of the Assad regime as a substantial shift. He noted the positive reception of Al-Sharaa by regional leaders while cautioning against possible destabilizing Israeli interventions in areas like the Druze community.
Lastly, Al-Rashed acknowledged Saudi Arabia’s transformative Vision 2030 initiative under Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, emphasizing social and economic reforms aimed at moderating Islam and positioning the Kingdom as a catalyst for wider regional change.
The article highlights the complex geopolitical landscape in the Middle East, emphasizing King Abdullah’s endorsement of Syria’s stability. It outlines the competing plans for Gaza’s future post-conflict, notably the Arab League’s proposals versus those of the US and Israel. Additionally, the discussions reflect optimism for Lebanon’s recovery under new leadership and significant shifts in Syrian governance. The overarching theme suggests the need for practical solutions and collaboration among regional players while supporting Palestine’s governance through legitimate frameworks.
Original Source: www.arabnews.com
