The digital divide in South Africa results more from high pricing models of mobile operators than infrastructure gaps. Despite claims from major MNOs about their role in bridging this divide, smaller service providers and government initiatives are leading the charge for connectivity in underserved areas. Recognizing these actors is essential for promoting true digital inclusion and addressing affordability issues.
The discussion surrounding South Africa’s digital divide has often been dominated by terms like “digital exclusion” and “connecting the unconnected.” However, it appears that these terminologies may have been popularized by the country’s mobile network operators (MNOs) to sway public opinion towards their services while maintaining high prepaid pricing models. This exclusion is less about infrastructure limitations and more about the exorbitant pricing set by these operators, which disproportionately affects the underprivileged.
Statistics from the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (Icasa) indicate that the country enjoys extensive mobile coverage, including 100% 2G, 99% 3G, and 98.5% LTE/4G access. If these figures are accurate, it would suggest that the digital divide is not due to a lack of infrastructure but rather a consequence of unaffordable pricing.
Following the Competition Tribunal’s decision to block the Vodacom-Maziv deal, Vodacom’s CEO, Shameel Joosub, characterized this ruling as a “travesty.” He claimed that the decision would lead to greater hardship for poorer communities and hinder progress in bridging the digital divide. However, post-failure of the merger, it has become evident that South Africa’s network expansion continues vigorously in underserved areas.
Examples of positive developments include the South African government’s broadband access fund, which supports smaller service providers in delivering connectivity to thousands of underserved homes and hotspots. Furthermore, many established Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are actively expanding into these communities and aim to connect over one million households within six months, offering affordable data packages starting at R5 per day.
Vodacom and MTN’s smallest data packages cost R5.50, allowing access to a mere 35MB. In contrast, Fibertime has connected over 70,000 homes in 13 townships, with plans to extend their services further. Similarly, Ilitha aims to connect 500,000 homes by rolling out wireless and fiber services in underserved areas.
Frogfoot Networks has acquired significant fiber assets from ATC and is strategically investing in smaller towns to provide affordable services, enabling local entrepreneurs and Wisps to connect homes. Other emerging companies such as Too Much WiFi and Project Isizwe are also contributing to these efforts, demonstrating the efficacy of smaller players in addressing connectivity challenges.
Communications Minister Solly Malatsi is advocating for digital inclusion by promoting affordable mobile devices, emphasizing the need to eliminate taxes on smartphones, which have become essential for digital participation. This initiative may compel major operators to reconsider their pricing structures to accommodate new users, although realization of this change seems unlikely.
It is essential to focus on tangible efforts spearheaded by smaller companies and government initiatives rather than the often unrealistic promises made by major operators. The notion that only large MNOs can bridge the digital divide is misleading and should not overshadow the genuine contributions of agile firms and grassroots initiatives.
Ultimately, recognizing and supporting these smaller entities is vital for creating a more equitable digital landscape in South Africa, as they are the true champions of connectivity and inclusion.
In summary, the discourse on South Africa’s digital divide must shift focus away from the inflated claims of mobile network operators and acknowledge the significant efforts of smaller providers and government initiatives. While infrastructure coverage appears sufficient, the primary barrier to access remains high pricing structures set by major operators. By supporting the initiatives of smaller companies and advocating for more affordable digital access, South Africa can make tangible strides towards bridging the digital divide and fostering digital inclusion for all.
Original Source: techcentral.co.za
