Former Peruvian President Pedro Castillo has begun a hunger strike in protest of his trial for rebellion, facing a potential 34-year prison sentence. He claims the trial is unjust and politicized, and has rejected legal assistance. The case follows his controversial attempt to dissolve Congress in December 2022, a move that led to his removal and significant unrest in Peru.
Former Peruvian President Pedro Castillo has announced a hunger strike in response to the initiation of his rebellion trial, during which the prosecution is seeking a 34-year prison sentence against him. Castillo, who has been in detention since December 7, 2022, asserts that he is protesting the injustices he believes he has suffered.
In his statement, Castillo attacked Judge Norma Carbajal for allegedly prejudging his case, criticizing her interpretation that armed rebellion does not necessitate physical violence. He further characterized the trial as “politicized” and a mere “pantomime,” insisting on his refusal of legal assistance provided by the judicial system.
During the trial’s opening last week, Castillo denied all allegations of rebellion, asserting, “The only thing I did was convey the people’s desire through a political speech.” He faces accusations stemming from his intent to dissolve Congress in order to circumvent a vote that sought his removal due to alleged moral incapacity to govern.
Castillo’s actions on December 7, 2022, resulted in Congress removing him from office, after which Dina Boluarte assumed the presidency. The aftermath of the events led to significant unrest, with over 50 civilian fatalities during protests in Peru. Additionally, Castillo is under investigation for corruption during his administration.
In summary, former President Pedro Castillo has initiated a hunger strike to protest what he perceives as unfair judicial proceedings against him. His trial for alleged rebellion has drawn significant controversy and highlights tensions within Peruvian politics, following his controversial attempt to dissolve Congress. Castillo’s claims of political persecution and refusal to accept legal representation reflect his deep discontent with the current judicial landscape.
Original Source: www.wral.com
