The Government of Guyana is criticized for incorporating the “One Guyana” slogan in the new passport, viewed by opposition members as a move towards a one-party state and a breach of democratic principles. The situation raises concerns regarding the neutrality of national symbols and state resources used for political branding.
The Government of Guyana faces mounting criticism over the inclusion of the slogan “One Guyana” in the new passport design. Opposition MP Amanza Walton-Desir condemned this move as a dangerous step towards a one-party state, indicating the slogan’s partisan nature undermines the passport’s status as a sovereign document for all citizens. Desir-Walton emphasized that the passport should remain neutral and reflect the nation’s collective identity, rather than being a vehicle for political propaganda.
In her criticism, Desir-Walton highlighted the government’s disregard for democratic principles by embedding political messaging within a document intended for all Guyanese, irrespective of their political loyalties. She referred to international standards, particularly those set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), which call for neutrality in passport design and prohibit partisan political expressions.
Additionally, she remarked that this incident is part of a larger pattern, mentioning various instances of state resources being used for political branding. This blurs the distinctions between the government and the ruling party, which she noted was a reversal of the previous political stance taken by the PPP against the actions of the PNC.
Furthermore, Walton-Desir warned that national identity is becoming subordinated to party loyalty, urging the international community and local citizens to recognize and challenge these developments. She drew attention to past criticisms of the PPP for painting government buildings in party colors, emphasizing a shift in their governance approach since assuming power.
In conclusion, the incorporation of the “One Guyana” slogan into the Guyana passport has generated significant controversy and raised critical questions regarding the Government’s commitment to democratic principles. Opposition leaders argue this decision signifies a troubling trend towards authoritarianism and the politicization of state resources, undermining the impartial status of national symbols. Advocates for a non-partisan approach to governance are calling for scrutiny from both the international community and citizens as they defend the integrity of national identity.
Original Source: newssourcegy.com
