Lebanon and Israel are initiating indirect talks to resolve border disputes, involving three committees established under Resolution 1701. Despite differing interpretations of the talks’ implications, key issues include border negotiations and the status of prisoners. The U.S. is facilitating this process, amid ongoing military tensions and accusations from both sides.
Recent developments indicate that Lebanon and Israel are progressing with indirect negotiations to resolve their longstanding border disputes, as reported by Al Mayadeen on March 12. This initiative involves the formation of three committees dedicated to addressing unresolved issues, primarily related to border concerns stemming from the conflicts of 2006. Sources clarify that this process is entirely consistent with the implementation of Resolution 1701 and does not represent an effort toward normalization of relations between the two nations.
The committees will specifically focus on key matters such as the border discrepancies and disputed territories, along with the status of prisoners. In this context, an Israeli official, while articulating a different perspective, indicated that these negotiations aim to achieve normalization. This statement came alongside news that five Lebanese prisoners were released by Israel as a perceived goodwill gesture toward Lebanese President Joseph Aoun.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office confirmed that this release was part of a broader agreement involving the United States, France, and Lebanon to create work groups intended to resolve outstanding border issues. U.S. envoy Morgan Ortagus emphasized that the discussions aim to diplomatically settle various points of contention, including the release of prisoners and the disputed zones along the Blue Line.
A total of 13 disputed locations have been identified, which include Ras al-Naqoura, Marwahin, and others that Israel was expected to vacate following the 2006 conflict. Additionally, several Lebanese regions have remained under Israeli control for an extended period, with Israel maintaining a presence in sites where ground confrontations with Hezbollah occurred.
Israel is also accused of conducting repeated military operations within southern Lebanon, purportedly to prevent Hezbollah from re-arming, despite stipulations from the UN Resolution that restrict such actions. The situation remains delicate, with ongoing accusations against Hezbollah concerning its military posture south of the Litani River. This complex backdrop highlights the continuing friction and diplomatic efforts as Lebanon and Israel navigate their contentious history.
In summary, Lebanon and Israel are embarking on indirect negotiations facilitated by the U.S. to address key issues regarding borders and prisoners, while firmly denying that these talks signify a move toward normalization. The establishment of negotiation committees is an attempt to resolve long-standing disputes under the framework of Resolution 1701. As the situation evolves, both nations remain entangled in a myriad of military and diplomatic challenges that will require careful navigation to achieve a peaceful resolution.
Original Source: thecradle.co
