Former IRGC officers criticize the Islamic Republic in an interview, revealing disillusionment and widespread corruption. Key insights include the impact of Israeli military actions and the growing divide between the IRGC and the regular army, indicating deeper internal dissent. The testimonies reflect a yearning for change among the Iranian people.
Several former officers of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) have voiced their dissent against the Islamic Republic during an unusual interview with Israeli media outlet N12. Javad, a former IRGC operative, publicly shared his involvement in quelling protests and details surrounding the assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh. He noted the precision of the Israeli intelligence operation that executed the assassination, asserting that it demonstrated how deeply Mossad had infiltrated the IRGC.
Following the assassination of Haniyeh, Javad remarked that the elimination of Hezbollah’s leader, Hassan Nasrallah, further illustrated Israel’s effectiveness. He described the collapse of Bashar Assad’s regime in Syria as a devastating blow for Iran, diminishing the IRGC’s strategic position in the region. Javad noted, “The IRGC lost one of its strongest fronts in Syria,” a statement that underscores a significant shift in the geopolitical landscape against Iranian interests.
Javad also addressed the systemic corruption within Iran, stating, “Corruption in Iran has doubled,” highlighting a growing consciousness among the populace. Reflecting on changes in his personal beliefs, he remarked, “The ones calling Israel corrupt are drowning in corruption themselves,” signaling a reconsideration of his previous views. This transformation illustrates the internal strife and disillusionment experienced by some within the IRGC.
Another important voice in the interview was Arash, a former lieutenant colonel in the Iranian Air Force, who shared insights into the military structure of Iran. He noted the division between the IRGC and the regular army, indicating rising tensions, especially following Israeli airstrikes that had compromised Iran’s air defense systems. Arash suggested that some members within the regular army were ready to revolt against the regime, reflecting a broader discontent towards governmental control.
Both Javad and Arash expressed support for Israeli military actions against Iran’s leadership, asserting that many Iranians found solace in these strikes. Javad explained, “95% of Iranians were happy when Israel struck those sites,” indicating that the public sentiment may lean towards preferring external intervention. Arash elaborated on this by stating that striking key IRGC bases could empower individuals to overthrow the regime, thus expressing a longing for political liberation among Iranian citizens.
The revelations from former IRGC officers highlight a significant internal division and dissatisfaction with the current Islamic Republic regime. Their testimonies not only underscore shifts in loyalty and trust among military ranks but also reveal a broader sentiment among the Iranian populace favoring Israeli actions against their government. This situation suggests a potentially profound resistance movement within Iran, driven by military disillusionment and public frustration with systemic corruption.
Original Source: www.jpost.com
