Top Azerbaijani official Elchin Amirbayov announces readiness for a peace deal with Armenia to settle their territorial dispute, urging constitutional reform in Armenia. While Azerbaijan seeks to dissolve third-party mediation, Armenia expresses disappointment at preconditions laid out by Azerbaijan. Furthermore, Amirbayov emphasizes the importance of strengthening economic ties with Argentina amid ongoing tensions.
Azerbaijan’s readiness to formalize a peace deal with Armenia was highlighted by Elchin Amirbayov, a key official, during his recent visit to Argentina. As the presidential representative for special assignments, he confirmed that the two nations are nearing the finalization of a significant treaty aimed at resolving their longstanding territorial disagreements.
The dialogue between Azerbaijan and Armenia, fundamentally influenced by their historical conflicts over Nagorno-Karabakh, intensified following a brief yet impactful military offensive by Azerbaijan in September 2023. This event compelled more than 100,000 Armenian individuals to evacuate the contested area. Both nations have since made headway towards a peace treaty, which received positive recognition from international bodies including the United States and European nations.
The proposed peace document includes stipulations for Armenia, specifically urging constitutional reforms that would renounce any claim to Nagorno-Karabakh. Amirbayov emphasized this reform as critical for ensuring lasting peace. He asserted, “The Armenian constitution today contains a territorial claim to part of Azerbaijan’s sovereign territory… it can pose a serious threat to the future of peace.”
In contrast, the Armenian Embassy in Argentina expressed dismay regarding Amirbayov’s remarks, claiming that Azerbaijan is “de facto refusing to sign the agreement” and advocating for preconditions rather than cooperating towards enduring peace. The embassy remains hopeful that Azerbaijan may still exhibit the necessary political will to advance diplomatic relations.
Further, Amirbayov indicated that the peace agreement would necessitate the removal of third-party mediators, including the existing OSCE-led “Minsk Process”. He argued for a direct relationship between Azerbaijan and Armenia, stating, “We strongly believe that the future of our relationship is in the hands of Armenia and Azerbaijan, and there is no need for any third party in this affair.”
In addition to discussions surrounding the peace process, Amirbayov’s agenda included trade relations, where he expressed a desire to enhance economic and agricultural ties with Argentina—home to a significant Armenian diaspora. He concluded that the ongoing conflict should not hinder these bilateral relations with Latin America.
In summary, Azerbaijan’s commitment to a peace agreement with Armenia reflects a potential shift towards resolving a longstanding conflict. However, the requirement for Armenia to amend its constitution and eliminate third-party mediators presents obstacles to achieving mutual understanding. The diplomatic relations between Azerbaijan and Argentina further underscore the complexity of regional dynamics intertwined with their historical disputes. A definitive resolution hinges upon both countries engaging in constructive dialogue moving forward.
Original Source: www.batimes.com.ar
