The article critiques the current political discourse in the Gambia, noting a lack of constructive criticism and alternative policies. It highlights the importance of addressing developmental challenges, youth unemployment, and food sovereignty. The author emphasizes the need for strategic thinkers to replace mere rhetoric with actionable solutions, advocating for a respectful democratic dialogue.
Political discourse in the Gambia has largely devolved into criticism, character assassination, and personal insults, lacking constructive alternative policies. Such behavior undermines democratic principles and prevents meaningful discussions on pressing developmental challenges. Some citizens focus solely on removing President Barrow, overlooking the fact that he represents a democratic leadership rather than an oppressive regime.
Critics calling for a revolution must recognize the differences between Gambian and Senegalese political contexts. The Senegalese constitution enforces strict term limits, unlike the Gambian constitution. Moreover, President Barrow does not obstruct political movements from participating in elections, as his predecessor did in Senegal. Political movements in the Gambia should present viable programs rather than merely focusing on condemning existing leadership.
The need for strategic thinkers in the Gambia is critical, particularly regarding the transformation of the education system. The colonial education system has failed to equip citizens with essential skills for economic independence. The prevailing economic structures continue to perpetuate poverty, affecting educational growth and economic advancement across Africa.
Youth unemployment remains a significant issue globally, including in the Gambia. It is crucial for those advocating for Barrow’s removal to propose meaningful alternative policies to address the unemployment crisis, an issue that threatens the future of many young Gambians. Currently, President Barrow’s administration is taking steps to manage youth unemployment, and alternatives should be articulated better by his opponents.
Furthermore, discussions about transforming agriculture to achieve food sovereignty must be prioritized over trivial issues. Food sovereignty allows countries to define their food systems without reliance on imports. Gambians need to distinguish between food sovereignty and food security, with the former emphasizing local production over reliance on external sources.
Allegations of corruption without substantial evidence do little to contribute to constructive political discussions. If such claims are true, actionable solutions must be proposed to tackle corruption within public service. Instead of engaging in provocation and confrontational rhetoric, Gambians should focus on the facts and seek constructive engagement in their political discourse.
While President Barrow may not be perfect, he promotes a vision of political engagement based on tolerance and patience, emphasizing the potential for constructive dialogue in a democratic framework. The Gambia has the opportunity to enhance its political culture through respectful and meaningful discourse aimed at national development and progress.
In conclusion, the article underscores the need for constructive political dialogue in the Gambia, moving beyond mere criticism of President Barrow’s administration. Emphasis should be placed on proposing viable solutions to pressing issues such as youth unemployment and food sovereignty, rather than focusing on trivial disputes. The political environment calls for strategic thinkers who can contribute to national transformation and progress, advocating for a more civil and tolerant discourse in the pursuit of democracy and development.
Original Source: thepoint.gm
