The article highlights the tension in Nigeria following President Tinubu’s state of emergency declaration in Rivers State, raising concerns about a shift towards military rule. Critics argue that this undermines democratic governance and could lead to economic repercussions by deterring foreign investment. The historical marginalization of local populations and ongoing political instability exacerbate the situation, urging a call for peaceful resolution.
The current atmosphere in Nigeria, particularly in Rivers State, is fraught with tension following President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency. The suspension of Governor Sim Fubara and subsequent actions have raised concerns among Nigerians regarding whether the country is heading down the path of military rule similar to that of Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso. Critics, including the Nigerian Bar Association, assert that the president’s actions are unlawful and in violation of democratic processes.
In the past, the Nigerian government condemned military takeovers in regional neighbors and emphasized the importance of democratic governance. Despite threats from ECOWAS to restore civilian rule, cadres in Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso have expressed satisfaction with their current regimes, which they claim have taken back control of national resources from foreign exploitation. Nonetheless, President Tinubu’s stance remains that military oversight is not acceptable and that democracy should prevail.
Public sentiment reflects a fear that declaring a state of emergency may exacerbate political instability rather than alleviate it. Observers have criticized the president’s declaration as lacking reference to key figures involved in the conflict, potentially sending a message of volatility that could deter foreign investment crucial for Nigeria’s economy. There is apprehension that the emergency rule could lead to governance stagnation in Rivers State, especially as the new administrator lacks full governmental authority.
The current situation has reignited political crises, highlighting underlying tensions among factions in Rivers State, particularly in relation to the civil service and local grievances. Previous leaders of the Ijaw nation in Rivers have noted their historical marginalization within state leadership and protested the impact of governmental decisions affecting the distribution of deterring resources.
With the economic climate fragile due to previous oil production disruptions, stakeholders warn that this political unrest may hinder ongoing recovery efforts. Observers caution that the government’s approach must shift from political maneuvering to fostering a conducive environment for investment. As foreign investors assess Nigeria’s stability, the current crisis in Rivers could significantly impede economic growth and development.
In summation, the declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State has stirred significant unrest, reminiscent of military interventions seen in neighboring countries. The actions taken by President Tinubu raise questions about Nigeria’s commitment to democracy and could negatively impact international investment. The potential for further political instability, alongside historical grievances, underscores the need for resolution through political dialogue rather than military measures.
Original Source: businessday.ng
