Indonesia plans to appeal a French court ruling that permitted the seizure of its diplomatic assets in a case involving Navayo International AG. The dispute originated from a stalled satellite project contract, leading to a multi-million-dollar arbitration case. Indonesia argues that due process was not followed and that diplomatic properties should remain immune from such actions, invoking the Vienna Convention.
Indonesia has announced its intention to appeal a French court decision that led to the seizure of its diplomatic assets. This legal development arises from a dispute with Liechtenstein-based company Navayo International AG over an unpaid $16 million contract related to a satellite project initiated by Indonesia’s Defense Ministry in 2016. Following Navayo’s lawsuit at an arbitration court in Singapore, the court ruled in favor of the company, subsequently demanding Indonesia to settle approximately $24.1 million by November 22, 2024, with accruing daily penalties for late payment.
Amid allegations of fraud regarding Navayo’s contracted work, the Indonesian government opted to defer payment. In retaliation, Navayo sought a French court’s approval to seize properties where Indonesian diplomats reside in Paris, which was granted. Senior legal affairs minister Yusril Ihza Mahendra made an effort during a diplomatic visit to Paris to persuade French officials to reverse this decision, arguing it to be unwarranted. “The court has given a chance for the Indonesian government to file an appeal,” Yusril stated, highlighting the upcoming appellate hearing scheduled for May.
During his discussions with French Justice Minister Gérald Darmanin, Yusril expressed Indonesia’s disappointment at the court’s ruling, emphasizing that Jakarta was not afforded an opportunity to present its defense, which he termed “a violation of international court practice.” He referenced the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, asserting that diplomatic assets are to be protected from seizure. Yusril cautioned that such a court ruling could create a dangerous precedent regarding the immunity of diplomatic properties worldwide.
To bolster its legal defense, Indonesia has engaged the services of a seasoned French lawyer and is pursuing legal action against Navayo for fraud. Yusril disclosed that audits revealed Navayo had only performed work equivalent to Rp 1.9 billion (approximately $114,531), a mere fraction of the $16 million owed. The Indonesian government is also contemplating seeking an Interpol red notice for Navayo to address these allegations.
In conclusion, Indonesia’s appeal against the French court ruling on the seizure of diplomatic assets underscores critical issues regarding the handling of international contracts and the protection of diplomatic immunity. The government’s proactive steps to engage legal representation and pursue fraud allegations against Navayo reflect its commitment to safeguarding its interests and upholding international laws. The upcoming court hearing in May presents a pivotal opportunity for Indonesia to contest the ruling and potentially redefine the treatment of diplomatic properties in similar legal contexts.
Original Source: jakartaglobe.id
