The DRC has sued Apple for using ‘conflict minerals’ in its products, alleging violations of human rights tied to these resources. This lawsuit, focused on 3TG minerals, highlights the challenges of sourcing materials from regions fraught with violence and exploitation. The ongoing investigation by Belgian authorities signifies the seriousness of these allegations in the corporate world.
The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has filed a lawsuit against Apple in Belgium and France, alleging the company is using ‘conflict minerals’ known as 3TG (tin, tantalum, tungsten, and gold) in its products, particularly iPhones. This lawsuit stems from concerns that such minerals are linked to human rights violations and the funding of armed groups within the DRC, a country rich in resources such as gold, diamonds, and cobalt, valued at an estimated $24 trillion.
More than 100 armed groups are engaged in conflicts over mining resources within the DRC, with heightened tensions between the DRC and Rwanda intensifying since 2021. Following the DRC’s lawsuit, Belgian prosecutors have begun an investigation into Apple’s practices, indicating that they are giving serious consideration to the case.
In April 2024, DRC authorities alerted Apple CEO Tim Cook and a French subsidiary about potential violations involving conflict minerals, requesting a response within three weeks. While Apple initially remained silent, it later informed the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that its vendors within the 3TG supply chain do not utilize conflict minerals.
The concept of ‘responsible mineral sourcing’ emphasizes the need for companies to avoid using minerals that can contribute to human rights abuses, particularly those that may finance armed conflicts. These minerals, termed ‘conflict minerals’ or ‘blood minerals,’ often originate from regions where mining operations are linked to violence and exploitation. The DRC is a focal point for this issue due to its wealth of minerals and the ongoing conflict involving numerous armed factions.
The allegations against Apple reflect broader concerns regarding corporate responsibility in mineral sourcing and the impact of supply chains on human rights. With the DRC’s lawsuit highlighting the potential connection between resource extraction and armed conflict, it underscores the need for transparency and accountability within global supply chains, particularly for companies operating in regions with known humanitarian challenges.
Original Source: gigazine.net
