The diplomatic relationship between South Africa and Rwanda has worsened due to accusations against the Rwandan-backed M23 rebel group for killing South African peacekeepers in DRC. Rwanda’s President retaliated by labeling South Africa as a belligerent force supporting government actions against civilians. The violence in DRC has raised concerns over South Africa’s military engagement and the welfare of its troops.
Diplomatic relations between South Africa and Rwanda have deteriorated sharply after South African President Cyril Ramaphosa accused the Rwandan-supported M23 rebel group of killing South African peacekeepers in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The M23 rebels have successfully captured much of Goma, the largest city in eastern DRC, prompting South Africa to issue warnings, declaring further attacks on its troops as a potential “declaration of war.”
In retaliation, Rwanda’s President Paul Kagame characterized South Africa as part of a “belligerent force” assisting the Congolese government in its fight against its populace. The conflict has claimed the lives of 13 South African soldiers this past week, highlighting the growing tensions and the tragic losses associated with the ongoing violence.
South Africa and Rwanda have a tense history, with past incidents such as the expulsion of Rwandan diplomats from Johannesburg in 2014 over an attack on an exiled dissident. While some diplomatic attempts to ease tensions were made following President Ramaphosa’s visit to Rwanda for genocide commemorations, the recent deaths of South African peacekeepers have reignited conflicts over troop presence in DRC.
South Africa’s peacekeeping troops, primarily under the Southern African Development Community (SADC) framework, are in DRC to combat armed groups and mitigate prolonged unrest over valuable mineral resources. The Mounting violence against these soldiers has raised significant concerns regarding the adequacy of their support and overall mission efficacy.
The heated exchange of statements has escalated, with President Ramaphosa confirming discussions with Kagame about a necessary ceasefire, while Kagame disputes the allegations, asserting that the Rwandan Defence Force is not a militia and emphasizing that M23 is not responsible for the casualties.
Currently, South Africa faces challenges in military capabilities, having lost critical air support due to budget cuts, which has left troops vulnerable. Analysts highlight the necessity for South Africa to reassess its military involvement in DRC, weighing the cost of continued engagement against the potential for further casualties among its soldiers.
The ongoing conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has historical roots involving various armed groups, including the M23 rebels, who have recently intensified their aggression. South Africa and Rwanda have historically had a complex relationship influenced by past conflicts and political tensions, underpinned by security concerns and geopolitical interests. The South African military has long been involved in peacekeeping efforts in the region but now finds itself amid adverse circumstances that threaten the safety of its personnel.
In conclusion, the deteriorating relations between South Africa and Rwanda over the conflict in DRC underscore the delicate balance of international diplomacy and military engagement. As hostilities continue, South Africa must carefully consider the implications of its military presence while addressing potential casualties among its peacekeepers. The situation remains volatile, with the potential for further escalation if diplomatic pathways are not pursued effectively.
Original Source: www.bbc.co.uk
