Sudan’s Tagaddum coalition has officially fractured into competing factions over the proposal for a parallel government, highlighting internal rifts amid ongoing conflicts between the army and Rapid Support Forces. Deputy Chairperson al-Hadi Idris advocates forming a government distinct from military leadership. Each faction will now develop its strategy pursuing peace and democratic rule, while the Sudanese government has announced a roadmap for post-conflict governance.
Sudan’s primary civilian coalition, Tagaddum, announced a formal split among its factions regarding the establishment of a parallel government. This division underscores the increasing tensions within the civilian bloc amidst an ongoing conflict involving the Sudanese army and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) militia.
The fracture stems from Deputy Chairperson al-Hadi Idris’s advocacy for a civilian regime that would challenge the legitimacy of the administration appointed by army chief General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan in Port Sudan. Tagaddum stated that its leadership, under former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok, convened to address these divergent views, ultimately concluding that a formal separation was necessary.
Tagaddum expressed that the optimal solution involves allowing groups to operate under distinct political and organizational identities, with each faction developing its own strategy for peace and democratic governance. While specific opposition groups were not named, it was noted that they constitute a majority within the coalition.
Supporters of the parallel government include former members of the Sovereignty Council, such as al-Hadi Idris and Mohamed Hassan al-Taayshi, as well as Suleiman Sandal, head of a faction of the Justice and Equality Movement. Tagaddum, which encompasses various political parties, military movements, and independent individuals, is one of the largest civilian political alliances in Sudan.
Recent weeks have witnessed the emergence of these divisions following Tagaddum’s announcement of a committee aimed at addressing the escalating conflict over the proposed parallel government in RSF-controlled regions. Meanwhile, the Sudanese government has introduced a roadmap for a post-conflict scenario, outlining the formation of a technocrat-led government, appointing a civilian prime minister, and initiating a national dialogue.
In summary, the Tagaddum coalition in Sudan has formally divided into factions over the contentious issue of a parallel government. This development reflects deepening divisions amidst the ongoing conflict in the nation. The coalition’s future strategies will now be pursued separately by each faction, aiming to establish peace and democratic governance, while the Sudanese government is concurrently outlining a plan for stabilization post-conflict.
Original Source: www.dailynewsegypt.com
